Nothing’s on fire. That’s exactly why it goes unnoticed. Here’s where a growing operation quietly loses six figures a year — every number a transparent calculation you can re-run against your own business.
Run it against my numbers →
Take a growing operation doing ~£4M a year — inventory, orders, a small team, and the usual stack that grew by accident: an accounting package, a couple of spreadsheets, a few inboxes, and one person who “just knows how it all works.” Nothing’s on fire. That’s exactly why the leak goes unnoticed.
Here’s where the money actually goes.
The same order gets typed in more than once — into the sales inbox, then the stock sheet, then the invoice. Two people spend ~2 hours a day each moving data between systems that don’t talk.
The “one true sheet” is fast until it isn’t. It breaks silently, it can’t be trusted at scale, and it makes one person a single point of failure for the whole company.
When you can’t see stock and orders in real time, you make decisions on gut and yesterday’s numbers.
None of it appears as a line on the P&L — which is exactly why it survives for years.
The same maths, transparent. Change the two inputs and watch the leak move. Defaults are the worked example above.
Assumptions are deliberately conservative: ~£20/hr loaded cost, a 0.5% attributed error tax, and ~2–3% of stock capital tied up wrong. Every line is shown, nothing is hidden.
An order arrives by email, gets typed into the stock sheet, then again into the invoice. The “one true spreadsheet” only one person understands. Stock decisions on last week’s count. You feel the leak; you can’t point at it.
Re-keyed · fragile · flying blindNot a full ERP, not a rebuild. One place where orders, stock and the numbers live — connected, live, and owned outright. Data entered once flows everywhere; the fragile sheet becomes a system the whole team can trust; the blind spots become a live picture.
Entered once · trusted · liveReal public reviews of the tools you’ve likely considered — describing the exact problem. These are their reviews of other software, not testimonials for OpsMavix. Beside each: what closing that leak is worth.
Stock sync is a mess, keeps zeroing out our Shopify stock.Glenn J., Managing DirectorCapterra review of Cin7
Stock entered once and trusted — no sync mess, no zeroed counts.
≈ £38k/yrManual adjustments don’t always stick, and sync issues between platforms make it impossible to trust the numbers.Kristin WillisTrustpilot review of Veeqo · 2025
Numbers the whole team can trust — adjustments that stick, no oversells.
≈ £31k/yrStock control is a nightmare as it doesn’t want to pull all the products from Magento, eBay and Amazon to keep them in sync.Chris RickardsTrustpilot review of Veeqo · 2025
One live stock picture across every channel — owned outright.
≈ £34k/yrSourced from public reviews. We quote the problem these operators describe — not an endorsement of OpsMavix. Their experience is exactly the gap a system you own is built to close. Real founding-client results replace these cards as we close them.
At a leak of ~£100k/yr, the fix pays for itself well inside the first year — usually on the first leak alone.
Where your operation actually leaks, what it’s costing, and what a fix would involve. No commitment — you keep the findings either way.
Book a free Operations Leak Audit →